|
Indirect valuation for wage types in 0014 |
Views: 1763
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread |
Payroll | Time | OM & PA | Portal | Payroll Fixes | Career Tips | SuccessFactors |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Indirect valuation for wage types in 0014
We have a requirement like the wage type in IT0014 should be evaluated on the other wage of IT0014 which has direct valuation.
Example: IT 0014 has wage types 1234 and 5678 wt 1234 direct valuation as it characteristics and the amount is entered manually in IT0014 when creating. wt 5678 should be calculated as 10% of 1234. i have checked with direct valuation for 1234and indirect valuation SUMME/prznt for 5678. the amount is given for WT1234 in 0014, but 5678 is not being calculated. |
Payroll | Time | OM & PA | Portal | Payroll Fixes | Career Tips | SuccessFactors |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Have you entered valuation base in table V_T539J?
SUMME 5678 1 01.01.1900 31.12.9999 1234 10,00
|
Payroll | Time | OM & PA | Portal | Payroll Fixes | Career Tips | SuccessFactors |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Maintain the ind.val percentage in t539j and also mantain the WT characteristics in t511 as INVAL n module varaint as B.
|
Payroll | Time | OM & PA | Portal | Payroll Fixes | Career Tips | SuccessFactors |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
i have maintained values in T539J.
my querry is that when the base wage type ie 1234 is direct valuation then WT 5678 is not being calculated. but when WT1234 is maintained as Tarif/constant then wt5678 is calculated on 1234. is there any solution to maintain 1234 as direct valuation and 5678 as indirect valuation which is calculated on 1234. |
Payroll | Time | OM & PA | Portal | Payroll Fixes | Career Tips | SuccessFactors |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
The entry in v_t539j is not sufficient u need to maintain in the raps table also.
While In direct Valuation of the wage type for the IT0014 it wont update the Raps table V_t7ina9 automatically so you need to maintain and save . Check by doing like this.... |